bismarck vs yamato vs Iowa Odgovor 1 : Težko rečem res. So she’s the fastest, most accurate vessel in this lineup. ... Súťaž sa potom stáva 3 triedami Yamato, 2 triedami Bismark vs 6 triedami Iowa a 5 triedami kráľa Juraja V. To je o niečo lepšie ako kurz 2: 1. bismarck vs yamato vs iowa. While Bismarck would avoid a nighttime duel, Iowa would welcome it—and its 2.5-knot advantage in speed means it can force a night battle if it wants to, chasing Bismarck … She’ll show up, put shells downrange, and get the job done. Nonetheless, Parshall gives a slight edge to Yamato here; if both ships suffered damage to their fire control systems and had to close the range, the invulnerability of Yamato’s turrets to Iowa’s shells could prove important. Ask the guys on Yamato. Iowa will circle her and pick it apart. The Yamato is arguably more durable than the Iowa, and her shells are also far heavier and hence more powerful. As such, the ship practically needs racing stripes. Yamato takes Bismarck under tow until tugs arrive. She’s big, at a Washington Naval Treaty-busting 50,000 tons. Iowa enjoyed a career through World War II, Korea and was even reactivated during the 1980s. I could spend all day telling you about this vessel, but let’s stick to the particulars relevant in this fight. She’s also fast, and her armor is proven effective–a debate rages to this day over whether the pounding she took in her final moments was really what took her out, or if her own crew scuttled her. Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway, The 5 Biggest Battleship Battles of All Time. Yamato vs Iowa - you've requested this one a long time and today's the day to show off that epic, cinematic naval duel between those two ships. Sunken battleships are the wrecks of large capital ships built from the 1880s to the mid-20th century that were either destroyed in battle, mined, deliberately destroyed in a weapons test, or scuttled.The battleship, as the might of a nation personified in a warship, played a vital role in the prestige, diplomacy, and military strategies of 20th century nations. But what if they had, in a cataclysmic clash of seagoing titans? The Yamato, Bismarck and King George V class were all in service early in the war, like 1940 -41. Marksmanship is a key consideration when trying to hit a moving target from 25 miles away, even one that is almost three football fields long. As whenever this comes up - Bismarck has no business being in this conversation. Finally, she has the lowest overall tonnage, at just over 42,000 tons, and she’s a hair slower than the other vessels, so she’ll have a harder time getting her guns in range. This gives her a battle-winning advantage in that she will literally be able to deploy her firepower when she sees fit, and withdraw it whenever necessary. Why is a battleships’s underwater armor important? In 1945 the era of the battlewagon was already ending, sinking beneath the weight of swarms of aircraft. In the end, a Yamato versus Iowa duel might have been a fascinating but futile curiosity. Bismarck wastes tonnage on a bunch of WWI scheme and has some serious design flaws. Yamato’s nine 18-inchers could throw a 3,200-pound shell out to 26 miles, while Iowa’s nine 16-inch guns could propel a 2,700-pound shell 24 miles. As cool as the Yamato was as a concept–a super-battleship, flinging 18.1″ shells at multiple targets simultaneously–I think she’s flawed. Is it Time to Bring Back the Battleships? Each ship will have a full crew, capable captains, and plenty of ammunition. Law of averages, you know. Given World War II fire control systems, the chance of hitting a battleship moving at 30 miles per hour from a distance of 25 miles is very small. This in itself wasn’t unusual for capital ships at this time, but it still puts her a little behind the other vessels present, who have better fire control systems. All Content Copyright Jonathan C. Gillespie. Here we’ll have two small islands, each 300 feet at the highest, each 5X5 miles in size, and each twenty miles apart, arranged roughly on the centerline of a plot of water 40 x 40 miles in size. They would have been surrounded by cruisers, destroyers and subs. I don’t expect everyone to agree with this–in fact, a few befuddled comments are always in store whenever you set up a match like this–but in my estimation, USS Iowa is simply the best ship in this battle. freagra 1: Deacair a rá i ndáiríre. Same with its sister ship. Would you pit an American P-40 Warhawk from 1941 against a German Me-262 from 1944? If he follows that reasoning here, he might maneuver to target ole’ George off the bat. But be it as it, Yamato could in fact turn more tightly than the Iowa. Today, our own Marine Corps has lamented the loss of the battleship, which always made a terrific fire-support platform for assisting amphibious landings — you know, that function Marines make a fine art. This sets up a nasty scenario for her: she’ll have to advance, under the full weight of an enemy vessel’s broadside, having her “T capped” the whole time, until she’s finally in effective range. Since both ships have little true combat history, we’ll have to leave this to speculation, but I still don’t doubt it. Osaliselt sõltub ilmast - selge ilma korral saaks Yamato / Musashi pikemat 18-tollist püssi kasutada maksimaalsel vahemikul, kuigi madala täpsusega. See, historically, when facing down a hunter-killer fleet in her legendary final battle, Lindemann hoped targeting the oldest battleship present, HMS Rodney, might allow him to knock it out quickly, leaving him to deal with “just” King George V and a host of smaller-class vessels. The Bismarck of the last generation of Dreadnought Battleships was the worst design. Like any of these other one-on-one duels, the result would be subject to luck. The Iowa-class probably couldn’t sink the Yamato but its 16-inch shells would have wrecked the Yamato’s superstructure and rendered her equipment inoperable. Bismarck vs Hood original WWII recordings footage door WolfschanzeArchiv 6 jaar geleden 2 minuten en 24 seconden 2.747.079 weergaven Original footage of ... USS Iowa vs IJN Yamato USS Iowa vs IJN Yamato door Binkov's Battlegrounds 2 jaar geleden 11 minuten en 6 seconden 780.475 weergaven How would have USS Iowa fared against IJN So with that said, here’s how I see things shaking out, and why. Bismarck‘s biggest problem, historically, was her mismanagement and misdeployment, as part of a surface fleet still hobbled by the fallout from the Treaty of Versailles, and with masters that didn’t quite know what to do with her. Vastus 1: Raske öelda. They were initially intended to intercept fast capital ships such as the Japanese Kongō class while also being capable of serving in a traditional battle line alongside slower battleships and act as its "fast wing". The Iowa class was a class of six fast battleships ordered by the United States Navy in 1939 and 1940. But if Yamato gets lucky and gets in the first hit or two, and they’re doozies, it could very easily be game over for Iowa.”, (Recommended: The 5 Most Deadly Battleships). bismarck vs yamato vs iowa. Absolutely not. Like her notable sister, Prince of Wales, King George V utilized lower-caliber 14″ guns, but did so in two turrets of four guns each, with an additional two-gun turret mounted just above and astern of the “A” turret. Japanese fire control radar was poor, while American fire control radar was the best in the world. Iowa could sail at 33 knots to Yamato’s 27, which would confer some advantage in opening or closing range. A lot, unfortunately. Iowa will do that, and win the day, though I imagine she’ll need some time in the drydock once her guns finally go silent. And so, our queen of the seas is Iowa. Afhænger delvist af vejret - hvis klart vejr, kunne de længere 18 ″-kanoner fra Yamato / Musashi bruges til maksimal rækkevidde, dog med lav nøjagtighed. Key point: This scenario is interesting and much would have come down to luck. (Recommended: The 5 Biggest Battleship Battles of All Time). bismarck vs yamato vs iowa. Two P-270 Moskit missiles hitting a target ship It depends. Although officially taken into IJN service, Bismarck never returns to combat status; the expense and difficulty of … So in my opinion, it wins vs Iowa. Published author specializing in science fiction, horror, and thrillers. Yamato had a displacement one-third larger than Iowa, which should confer a … … Both her armament and armour were lacking compared to 'real' battleships, at 8 x 14in vs vs 9 x 16in. As some of you may recall, the first edition of this page featured a three-way race between Bismarck, Yamato and Iowa.I received quite a volume of e-mail from overseas (including some from Germany, surprise, surprise...) debating various points of contention. The Japanese tendency towards counter-flooding probably stemmed from necessity, given all their top-heavy ships, but I think it was one of many questionable practices the Imperial Japanese Navy encouraged. Based strictly on raw numbers, I would give the edge to Iowa based on her superior fire control. For his analysis, Parshall assumes that both battleship captains would close the range to less than 23 miles. Three years is a long time in WWII terms. Deelweis hängt vum Wieder of - wa kloer Wieder déi méi laang 18 ″ Waffen vun der Yamato / Musashi kéinten awer op maximaler Reih benotzt ginn, awer mat gerenger Genauegkeet. While both ships enjoyed certain advantages over each other, those advantages are so slender that luck would probably play as decisive role as firepower and armor. That also means any changes after that period will not be present. Those 14″ guns, being a smaller caliber, also have less effective range than those this ship’s adversaries are bringing to bear. (Recommended: Is it Time to Bring Back the Battleships?). And after a while, odds are, they probably will.”. In reality, the two ships never met in battle. Yamato seemingly had the edge here, with 16 inches of belt armor to Iowa’s 12 inches. The Bismarck is my all-time favorite warship, of any navy, in any time period, outside of perhaps the USS Enterprise, NCC-1701-E. She’s a lovely lady, quite stunning, really–but don’t tell that to Captain Ernst Lindemann, who insisted on this ship being called a “He”. Yamato takes Bismarck under tow until tugs arrive. Sorry, Iowa–no tomahawk cruise missiles. “In a 1945 test, an American battleship (the North Carolina) was able to maintain a constant [fire control] solution even when performing back to back high-speed 450-degree turns, followed by back-to-back 100-degree turns,” Parshall writes. Each ship will be at the top of its WWII-era form. Iowa versus Yamato is a coin-flip. Iowa was built to keep up with fast carriers. In the other corner, Iowa, at 45,000 tons the pride of America's World War II battleship fleet. In fact, the only time battleships slugged it out, without all the small fry in the way, was when Bismarck and the German cruiser Prinz Eugen confronted the British battleship Prince of Wales and the battlecruiser Hood in the Battle of the Denmark Strait. Vast in expense, and finally rendered (mostly) irrelevant by air power, the last battleships in service were decommissioned in the early 90’s. The Yamato had neither. She has 26″ armor plate on the front of her turrets. Beror delvis på vädret - om klart väder kan de längre 18 ″-kanonerna från Yamato / Musashi användas på maximalt område men med låg noggrannhet. The 14″, quad-gun arrangement proved less-than-sterling in practice. Modern navies don’t use battleships, so modern destroyers don’t typically carry weapons precisely tuned against the battleships. The battleship, moreso than any kind of warship–excepting perhaps the man O’ war–was often the visual representation of a country’s military might. © Copyright 2021 Center for the National Interest All Rights Reserved. Yet the real issue was even hitting the target in the first place. Iowa could sail at 33 knots to Yamato’s 27, which would confer some advantage in opening or closing range. Svar 1: Svårt att säga verkligen. “As such, hers is a sort of ‘brute force’ approach to protection. So which battleship would win? But tell that to the German warship Bismarck, which was ultimately hunted down and sunk after a 14-inch shell from the British Prince of Wales landed short, dove through the water and penetrated the German battleship below her more lightly armored waterline. bismarck vs yamato vs iowa. Yamato is obviously the more powerful ship. Yamato had a displacement one-third larger than Iowa, which should confer a … “All optics do a very good job at determining bearing to the target, but not so good at determining range,” Parshall says. Deloma je odvisno od vremena - če bi bilo jasno vreme, bi bilo mogoče z daljšimi 18-palčnimi puškami Yamato / Musashi uporabljati v največjem dosegu, čeprav z majhno natančnostjo. But this is a battle defined by two factors, in my opinion: accurate gunnery, and good damage control. beäntweren 1: Hard ze soen wierklech. Battleship Shootout: KM Bismarck vs. USS Iowa vs. IJN Yamato vs. HMS King George V September 28, 2012 in General Topics The battleship , moreso than any kind of warship–excepting perhaps the man O’ war –was often the visual representation of a country’s military might. And before anyone complains, I excluded ships that were commissioned after the war. This meant she brought ten of these bad boys to the party. Added to all of this is the tenacious American damage control ability. That kind of scenario would completely upend my predictions. (Battleship images scanned from Gibbons, "The Complete Encyclopedia of Battleships.") Yamato and Iowa wouldn’t have stood turret-to-turret in an arena like a pair of heavyweight boxers. However, the Japanese had superb optical rangefinders and night binoculars, which enabled them to surprise and decimate the U.S. Navy in night battles off Guadalcanal. The philosophy behind this stated that 14″ shells could penetrate just about any naval armor, and the greater number of guns gave her a greater chance of landing hits. However, Yamato had poor seams between her upper and lower armor belts, which allowed water to enter when she was torpedoed by U.S. aircraft off Okinawa. Even though Japanese shells were less effective than American ones, the range advantage should belong to Yamato. At that distance, both the Yamato’s and Iowa’s guns could penetrate each other’s armor. They have good range, great killing power, and–this is key–Iowa has both top-notch fire-control radar and a CIC onboard (combat information center). They were both over run by dive bombers and torpedo bombers. bismarck vs yamato vs iowa. However, as Parshall points out, only America could afford to build battleships with hulls and interiors constructed entirely out of tough but light Special Treatment Steel, which meant that U.S. battleships could be smaller and lighter for an equivalent amount of protection. Of the seven battleships Parshall analyzed, Yamato and Iowa had the best underwater armor. However, air power and a fleet of escorts meant such a one-on-one fight could not have happened. Yes, she’s tough. So, no HMS Vanguard. The Royal Navy doesn’t do anything halfway, including damage control. bismarck vs yamato vs iowa. So, what’s not to love? But when it comes to damage control, America was far ahead of Japan and other nations. It would have been the ultimate duel of dreadnoughts. This, provided she doesn’t completely unravel my order. I see an unholy alliance between Iowa and Bismarck until Yamato goes to the bottom. Fiction For Every Reader! Yamato had a displacement one-third larger than Iowa, which should confer a larger ability to absorb damage. ... glad we are on same page. Hood vs Bismarck, okay we all know that Hood was sunk by Bismarck yada yada, but Hood was already at a disadvantage. Valid points regarding Bismarck's vs. Iowa & Yamato -- Bismarck is really the only BB of her generation to take that kind of extended gunfire punishment at close range, so it's impossible to say for sure whether comparable ships like Yamato or Iowa would of fared better or worse. bismarck vs yamato vs iowa. (Acknowledgement: this post was inspired by author Geoff Micks and his commentary on an imaginary knife fight between all United States Presidents.). Iowa’s guns enjoy nearly 20% greater kinetic energy compared to SD and NC’’s. While Yamato was thickly armored everywhere, Iowa’s armor was thicker over her more vital areas. Here was perhaps the Iowa’s biggest advantage. Going with my assumed ranking, though, Bismarck loses this fight because while “he” does most things well–Iowa does everything great. Since they couldn't match American quantity, it was Japanese navy doctrine for each warship to be more powerful than its individual U.S. counterpart. “This was a much better performance than other contemporary systems,” he continues, “and gave U.S. battleships a major tactical advantage, in that they could both shoot and maneuver, whereas their opponents could only do one or the other.”. bismarck vs yamato vs iowa. The Japanese vessel had 9 inches of deck armor to Iowa’s 6, and an impressive 26 inches of armor on the faces of her main gun turrets, versus just 20 inches of turret armor for Iowa. bismarck vs yamato vs iowa. She’s a majestic vessel, an utter legend, but I think in this fight she’ll be a lame duck. This ensures the ships can maneuver somewhat, but the terrain won’t be a deciding factor. remade this, my other Iowa vs Yamato video kind of sucked, let me know what you think of this and and subscribe The Iowa class was more late war, like 1943-44. Battlewagons hurled big cannon shells at each other, not torpedoes, which is why battleships tended to be more heavily armored above the waterline. Radarless Iowa vs Yamato: 1944 Post by Karl Heidenreich » Thu May 18, 2006 6:46 pm With this thing about Bismarck vs. Iowa it ocurred to me that we can create a more "interesting" scenario: So, the combination of decent optics plus world-class radar is way better than world-class optics plus crappy radar.”. Jon Parshall, historian and author of the superb Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway has pitted the top battleships of various nations against each other at Combinedfleet.com, the go-to site for information on the Imperial Japanese Navy. It made for cramped gun turrets, as well as technical issues. So having such admiration for these steel dragons, I’m going to give you four of the very best battleships of WWII, each of which embodied their country’s design strategy, and we’re going to unleash them against each other. Our combatants will be the legendary KM Bismarck, the proud USS Iowa, the massive IJN Yamato, and the fearless HMS King George V. For the purposes of our fight, I’ve selected an imaginary patch of sea in the Indian Ocean. Have I lost my mind? The Tirpitz vs South Dakota thread had a lot of interesting discussion and conclusions, so I’m curious what the stance of people on this board is on how a similar battle scenario except with Iowa faced up against Yamato would play out. She bombarded shore targets aplenty, but never had the chance to engage an enemy battleship. Apart from having larger guns, Iowa & Yamato are much more advanced designs. But optics were susceptible to bad weather and smoke. “The chances of any given shell giving us a good underwater effect is pretty low,” Parshall noted. The Brits chose practicality over raw gun caliber with this class of battleships. Plus, she has that always-impeccable British seamanship on her side. With respect to 45 and 50 caliber 16” guns, 2300 vs 2500 fps is a difference of 19% in kinetic energy. As part of its quest for qualitative superiority, Japan trained its battleship crews in long-range shots to achieve such devastating underwater hits. In short, Iowa is going to loiter at the edges of the battlefield and *define* this fight. “Yamato was simply built to stand up to and utterly outclass any conceivable American or British opponent by sheer weight of gunfire and elephant-like armor,” Parshall writes. I’d love to hear different opinions in the comments. Válasz 1: Nehéz megmondani igazán. Titles available for paperback, Kindle, Nook, and other platforms. As mentioned, the title features over 300 World War I and WWII naval vessels such as Iowa, Bismarck, and Yamato. She’s the fastest present, at 32 knots, and pulls this off despite being similar in tonnage to Bismarck. Here Parshall lumps together several factors, such as speed and damage control. King George V suffered gun malfunctions in training exercises and in combat–ironically, both she and Prince of Wales had main battery problems during showdowns with the Bismarck. This will be a free-for-all fight, and it ain’t over until only one ship is left above the waves. Being the most prominent target on the battlefield, she is going to draw fire right out the gate. (yamato took 12 bombs and 7 torpedos) Considering that the Arizona took 1 bomb to sink it, yamato is dam tank. Both of these warships were the best of their time. bismarck vs yamato vs iowa. When shells start hitting her, confusion is going to multiply quickly. “Iowa’s fire control is better. bismarck vs yamato vs iowa. Yamato’s 18.1-inch guns were the largest ever mounted on a warship. Részben az időjárástól függ - tiszta idő esetén a Yamato / Musashi hosszabb, 18 ″ fegyvereit maximálisan lehetett használni, bár alacsony pontossággal. Deep Space Nine: First Time (#DS91sttime), What Settling Into Your Forties Really Means, Ten Horror Movies Worth Seeing, #10: The Exorcism of Emily Rose, Ten Horror Movies Worth Seeing, #9: He Never Died, Ten Horror Movies Worth Seeing, #8: Dog Soldiers, Ten Horror Movies Worth Seeing, #7: The Witch. Yamato cannot out turn it or match speed. One researcher can offer an answer, or at least a very educated guess. Those other nations building modern battleships would have done more with the same tonnage and did. This concept was exemplified during the sinking of the German battleship Bismarck by … Svar 1: Svært at sige virkelig. She’s also technologically behind her game. Who would have won? In war, the victory results not so much as when one fights well, but rather when one forces their opponent to fight poorly. Iowa could sail at 33 knots to Yamato’s 27, which would confer some advantage in opening or closing range. Among the battleships he compares are Yamato and Iowa, based on five criteria: guns, armor, underwater protection, fire control and “tactical factors” such as speed and damage control. Of course, this scenario is hypothetical, the province of armchair admirals and war gamers. Her armor layout isn’t the most efficient, but she has a lot of armor, so it doesn’t really matter.”. bismarck vs yamato vs iowa. But it would only take a lucky hit or two to knock out a radar, and with those powerful 18.1-inch guns, a hit from Yamato’s main battery would hurt Iowa. She took hundreds of bombs, and several torpedoes, before she went to the bottom in Operation Ten-Go. Braitheann sé go páirteach ar an aimsir - má bhíonn aimsir shoiléir ann d’fhéadfaí na gunnaí 18 ″ níos faide den Yamato / Musashi a úsáid ag an raon uasta ach le cruinneas íseal. Here, she’ll do what she was designed to: engage at long range other capital ships, at a sort of stand-off distance. “But if you throw enough shells up in the air, strange things can happen. Yamato is also a far better sea boat, dryer and far steadier gun platform. She’s also using voice pipes–voice pipes. In one corner, Japan’s Yamato, weighing in at 65,000 tons, the biggest battleship in history. I’ve also read more than a few sources suggesting the ship’s guns had accuracy issues, and that the Japanese were aware of this and tended to utilize she and her sister ship, Musashi, as deterrents and not active combatants. “World War II radar, on the flip, could give you a very good range number, but unless you had a modern set, getting a decent bearing was a real bear. Buy REVENANT MAN, Book One of The Tyrant Strategy, today. Iowa vs Yamato, the age old question of which ship will come out on top. “That’s why I say there’s a lot of luck involved here,” Parshall explained. Why does she make third? She’s a slugger, too: three turrets, each with three 16″ guns. For all her firepower, she lacked true fire control radar (she had general-purpose radar sets, but nothing designed to aim her guns). Besides, there are people here who would argue that both Vanguard and Bismarck are more powerful than Iowa, so how about one of them? bismarck vs yamato vs iowa. In fact, Yamato was sunk during its suicide run to Okinawa on April 7, 1945, overwhelmed by waves of U.S. carrier-based torpedo bombers. Bismarck has eight 15″ guns, arranged in four turrets of two guns each, meaning she loses less firepower, if a turret is knocked out, than her opponents do. An alien-enhanced super soldier and a reincarnated military genius spark a revolution in the shattered remnants of the United States. Although officially taken into IJN service, Bismarck never returns to combat status; the expense and difficulty of …
Easy Ocarina Songs 12 Hole, Frozen Crawfish Tails Walmart, Dehydrated Pork Skin For Dogs, The Steve Wilkos Show, Holly Rowe Play Softball, Persona 4 - Reach Out To The Truth Guitar Tab, Kasaysayan Ng Nueva Ecija Brainly, What Does The Name Helen Mean In Hebrew, Costco Chocolate Covered Strawberries, Biltong Recipe With Worcester Sauce, Stock Track Shoppers,